Follow Us:

NCLAT

Financial Creditor can initiate action under Section 7 of IBC, 2016

February 5, 2022 2964 Views 0 comment Print

Niew taken by NC:LT in Beacon Trusteeship Limited is not inconsonance with Section 7 read with Section 238 of ‘I&B Code’. Financial Creditor has full right to initiate action under Section 7 for non-payment of dues.

Superseded directors not entitled to participate in meeting of Committee of Creditors

February 4, 2022 5160 Views 0 comment Print

Dheeraj Wadhawan Vs Administrator, Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (NCLAT Delhi) Facts- The Company Appeal is filed by Appellant Dheeraj Wadhawan, erstwhile Promoter/Director of DHFL, against the Order dated 28 April 2020 in the Miscellaneous Application being numbered as MA 518 of 2020 in Company Petition (IB) No. 4258/2019 under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency […]

NCLT/NCLAT not empowered to deal with matter under PMLA

January 31, 2022 5745 Views 0 comment Print

Kiran Shah Vs Enforcement Directorate (NCLAT Delhi) In so far as anyone aggrieved against any decision or order of the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ of the PMLA, then it is open to him to prefer an Appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA by resorting to the relevant provision(s) of the ‘Prevention of the Money Laundering Act, 2002’. […]

Approved resolution plan is not a confidential document and can be made available to genuine claimant

January 27, 2022 8889 Views 0 comment Print

Association of aggrieved Workmen Association of aggrieved Workmen of of Jet Airways (India) Limited Vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) Facts- The only question involved is whether the appellant is entitled for a copy of resolution plan or any part of it. Notably, the resolution plan is already approved by the Adjudicating Authority. Conclusion- Resolution plan […]

IBC 2016: Limitation period of section 42 not applicable to Application filed U/s. 60(5)

January 17, 2022 5166 Views 0 comment Print

In the SICOM Limited vs. Sundaresh Bhat case, the Appellant’s U/s. 60(5) Application was accepted. Learn why Section 42’s limitation doesn’t apply.

Condonation Application not required to be filed after SC Order: NCLAT

January 16, 2022 15447 Views 0 comment Print

Essjay Ericsson Private Limited Vs Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) When the limitation has extended by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the orders noted above, for a period covering extension of limitation neither application is required nor there is any discretion of Court or Tribunal to consider sufficiency of delay. We are […]

NCLAT explains provisions of Section 97 of IBC, 2016

January 11, 2022 2889 Views 0 comment Print

Kanchan Nanubhai Desai Personal Guarantor Vs Finquest Financial Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT, Delhi) There cannot be any dispute with the statutory scheme as contained in Section 97 that when Application is filed by the Resolution Professional under Section 95, the Adjudicating Authority shall direct the Board within seven days of the date of […]

NCLAT Stays Order Initiating CIRP as parties entered Settlement Agreement

January 11, 2022 1518 Views 0 comment Print

Vinayak K Deshpande Vs Nexo Industries P Ltd (NCLAT Chennai) In view of the fact that the Settlement Agreement has been entered into between the parties and based on the said Agreement, the subject matter is issue is resolved between the parties, as informed by the Learned Counsels appearing for the parties, this ‘Tribunal’, dismisses […]

Application for reduction of share capital maintainable under Section 66: NCLAT

December 31, 2021 7515 Views 0 comment Print

Brillio Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Registrar of Companies (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT that the NCLT has erroneously held that the Application for reduction of share is not maintainable under Section 66 of the Act, consent affidavits from the creditors is mandatory for reduction of share capital, SPA cannot be utilized for making payment to non-promoter shareholders, […]

No recovery of ‘listing fee’ dues as operational debt under IBC

December 28, 2021 2592 Views 0 comment Print

Since assessee had initiated the insolvency proceedings against the Corporate Debtor only as a recovery mechanism to recover dues of ‘listing fees’ however, IB Code was not meant for recovery of dues of creditors.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930