ITAT Mumbai rules that comparables cannot be excluded if their financial data can be reasonably extrapolated, in Syngenta Services Private Limited’s case.
ITAT held that non-initiation of penalty proceedings under section 270A by the AO, in light of the addition made under the head ‘income from house property’, rendered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue’s interest.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai’s ruling on Datta Prasad Sahakari Patsanstha’s appeal against the denial of deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) for the assessment year 2011-12.
Delve into the detailed analysis of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in ACIT Vs Priyanka Ankit Miglani case regarding long-term capital gains from share sales and the application of Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai decides on disallowances under Section 14A and additional depreciation in book profits under Section 115JB in ATC Global Logistics vs ACIT case.
In the case of Supreme Treon Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT, ITAT Mumbai allows deduction under section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act for ITR filed with Form 10CCB.
ITAT Mumbai held that exclusion of comparables for the reason that those companies are loss making or low profit making is not correct. Accordingly, TPO directed to include these comparables and re-compute the Arm’s Length Price (ALP).
ITAT Mumbai rules against penalty under Sec 271G for a diamond trader’s failure to provide segmental information, emphasizing substantial compliance.
Mumbai ITAT rules in favor of S.K. Ventures, ensuring taxpayers’ right to Sec 80IB deduction is protected despite e-filing technical issues for AY 2017-18.
Mumbai ITAT reinstates appeal due to CIT(A)’s failure to consider case merits in Rajkumar Anandchand Jain Vs DCIT, emphasizing proper legal procedures.
