ITAT Mumbai ruled that an assessee who temporarily holds cash is not its owner, leading to the deletion of Section 69A additions for unexplained money.
Learn about the ITAT Mumbai’s ruling in the P&G case, which found that reimbursement for ESOP and ISOP plans is a deductible business expense, not a capital or contingent expense.
ITAT Mumbai rules that the AO’s view on CSR expenditure being allowable under Section 80G is plausible, setting aside a Section 263 revision due to the debatable nature of the issue.
ITAT Mumbai deletes a ₹1.69 crore addition under Section 69A against Parth Ajit Pawar. The ruling emphasizes that a third-party statement without cross-examination and corroborating evidence is not valid for making additions.
ITAT Mumbai rules that fiduciary journal transfers without cash flow cannot be taxed as unexplained cash credits under Section 68, supporting taxpayers in similar situations.
ITAT Mumbai held that revisionary order passed u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act cannot be sustained to the extent AO duly examined the issue during scrutiny assessment proceedings and plausible view taken after proper application of mind.
It was held that Long-term capital gains on sale of “penny” stocks could not be treated as bogus & unexplained cash credit if the documentation was in order & there was no allegation of manipulation by SEBI or the BSE.
ITAT Mumbai overturns PCIT’s Section 263 order against Inter Gold (India) Pvt. Ltd. Tribunal finds AO’s assessment valid on 80G CSR donations, bank charges, and disallowed provisions.
Assessee claimed deduction under section 54F on the basis that the long-term capital gain earned from the transfer of tenancy/possessory rights was invested for the purchase of a residential flat.
ITAT Mumbai held that where the entire foundation of reopening solely based on material found during the search of another person, the appropriate course of action is to proceed under Section 153C, and not under Section 147. Accordingly, reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 quashed.
