The Madras High Court directed reassessment of GST interest, holding that tax already paid before notice issuance must be considered while computing interest under Section 39.
The Court directed reconsideration of a GST demand after finding that the taxpayer’s reply was not fully evaluated in confirming an ITC discrepancy.
Dismissing borrower’s petition, High Court held that a 15-day gap between publication and auction meets statutory requirement for a subsequent sale and that auction notice contained sufficient property description and valid valuation.
Madras High Court permitted Tvl. Red Rose Garments to debit 50% of its four-month tax dues from a negatively blocked ITC ledger, pending final proceedings.
Madras High Court remitted a case for fresh adjudication after finding that fake invoices were generated in the petitioner’s GSTR-1 by an auditor to aid wrongful ITC claims.
Madras High Court remitted GST assessments to authorities after finding that Hind Aluminium failed to substantiate its replies and VAT turnover was included.
Madras High Court allowed revival of cancelled GST registration in line with Suguna Cut Piece Centre ruling, directing compliance-based restoration.
Madras High Court held that the matter involving sexual harassment complaint against IRS officer needs a fresh inquiry. Accordingly, High Court directs Internal Complaints Committee [ICC] to be re-constituted. Further, High Court also issued a series of directions for conduct of inquiry.
The Madras High Court reserved petitioners’ right to claim a tax refund, agreeing to defer the decision until the Supreme Court rules on the SLP challenging the Gujarat High Court’s judgment in Sal Steels Limited. The Revenue cited conflicting rulings from the Delhi and Allahabad High Courts as grounds for delay.
Once the order of ITAT had attained finality on factual aspects and assessee had discharged the entire liability, the Tax Recovery Officer was bound, under Section 225(2) to lift the attachment on property.
