Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Rajeev Kumar Kapoor (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Rajeev Kumar Kapoor (ITAT Lucknow) The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) deleting additions made under section 143(3) read with section 144B for Assessment Year 2021-22. The Assessing Officer (AO) had made an addition of ₹88,16,120 under section 69C read with section 115BBE, being 20% of purchases made from one party, Mohammad Ashraf Mandal (M/s A.M. Ornaments), treating them as bogus. The AO also disallowed ₹6,893 being interest paid on delayed deposit of TDS, invoking Explanation 1 to section 37(1). The assessee, engaged in trading of gold, silver and bullion...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031