Sulochana Gupta Vs RBG Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Kerala High Court) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can be for the enforcement of fundamental rights or for any other purpose, as envisaged under Article 226 of the Constitution. There is no pleadings or materials to substantiate that the appellants are discharging […]
The issue under consideration is whether revised amount can be taken as the quantified amount to test the eligibility for Sabka Vikas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR)?
Rajive And Company Vs. Assistant Commissioner Special Circle (Kerala High Court) Petitioners will no doubt be entitled to seek copies of the documents seized from their premises, if and when they are confronted by the respondents with any notice or other proceeding, wherein reliance is placed on the said seized documents. I, therefore, make it […]
The issue under consideration is whether detention of goods merely because the consignee is mentioned as an unregistered person in the e-way bill is justified in law?
High Court gave direction to the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for carry forward of accumulated credit through the Form GST- Tran 1 afresh in the light of Standard Operating Procedure
The issue under consideration is whether the serving of assessment order by uploading it on web portal and not communicated separately to the assessee will be considered as valid under law?
Jagadish Advertising Vs Designated Committee (Karnataka High Court) The petitioner in this petition has sought for quashing of the statement issued by the Designated Committee in Form Nos. SVLDRS-2 & SVLDRS-3 and is seeking for a direction to the Designated Committee to accept the declaration made by him in Form No.SVLDRS- 1 as final. In […]
The issue under consideration is whether goods can be detained merely because IGST applicable is not mentioned in the e-way bill?
The issue under consideration is whether the gram panchayath is correct in rejecting the lowest bid amount tender submitted by the petitioner just because tax disclosure and test report is not submitted by him?
whether the serving of assessment order by uploading it on web portal and not communicated separately to the assessee will be considered as valid under law?
