I reckon the petitioner has exercised on time its statutory remedy of filing an appeal. It appears that it has also filed a stay petition. Procedural fairness demands that the authorities may wait, before taking further steps, until the appellate authority decides on the stay petition.
Deduction under section 35D for amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the issue of shares for public subscription was allowable to assessee bank extending financial services.
Transfer of patent rights would be subject to CST as while transferring of intangible rights obtained under a statute, to another entity having its place of business in another State; from where the transferee intended to exercise such rights thereafter, postulated a movement of the intangible, corporeal goods from one State to another and, hence, would be an inter-state sale assessable to tax.
M/s. Lal Products Vs Intelligence Officer (Kerala High Court) Hon’ble Kerala High Court had an occasion to determine the situs of sale of incorporeal goods namely, patents and trademarks when the contract of sale was executed by the Appellant in the state of Gujarat where they had one operating manufacturing plant while the HO of […]
Kun Motor Co.Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Asst. State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) In the present case the challenge was to the judgment of the Kerala HC in the case reported in 2018-TIOL-163-Ker-HC. A person from Trivandrum goes to Pondicherry, purchases a car, and entrusts it to the car dealer to transport it to Trivandrum. […]
M/S. Swarnashilpi Vs Assistant State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) In W.P.(C) No.13090 of 2018, the petitioner challenged the Ext.P6 assessment order. When the matter was taken up, the learned Government Pleader pointed out that the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy. Then, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that under the new tax regime—Goods and Services Tax— […]
If a human error which can be seen on naked eye is detected, such human error cannot be capitalised for penalisation. Normally, this Court could not have persuaded to accept the contention on prima facie value as it is a matter for decision by competent authority and this Court can only order release of the vehicle and goods as against Bank guarantee.
Daily Express Vs Assistant State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) Section 129 is a self-contained code. It lays down the entire mechanism for provisional release of the goods. Section 129 begins with a non-obstante clause. It stands protected from every other provision. Earlier this Court, on more than one occasion, has held that unfilled Part […]
Hotel Harisree Vs Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) (Kerala High Court) The petitioner, a registered dealer under the KGST Act on the rolls of the 1st respondent, questioned the Ext.P1 assessment order, before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner has also filed a stay petition in the appeal. Ventilating its grievance that the authorities are taking coercive steps before […]
Strangely, the authorities still insist that the payment should be by physical means: either in cash or through Demand Draft (DD). That insistence seems to be archaic and out of tune with the very spirit of the GST regime
