Case Law Details
Case Name : Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 1996-97
Courts :
All High Courts Kerala High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Conclusion: Deduction under section 35D for amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the issue of shares for public subscription was allowable to assessee bank extending financial services.
Held: AO denied deduction under section 35D on the ground that assessee was a bank extending financial services and not an industrial undertaking therefore, it would not be entitled to amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.