Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 1996-97
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court) Conclusion: Deduction under section 35D for amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the issue of shares for public subscription was allowable to assessee bank extending financial services. Held: AO denied deduction under section 35D on the ground that assessee was a bank extending financial services and not an industrial undertaking therefore, it would not be entitled to amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the issue of shares for public subscription. It was held the manner in which the “industrial undertaki...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031