Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 1996-97
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court)

Conclusion: Deduction under section 35D for amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the issue of shares for public subscription was allowable to assessee bank extending financial services.

Held: AO denied deduction under section 35D on the ground that assessee was a bank extending financial services and not an industrial undertaking therefore, it would not be entitled to amortisation of preliminary expenses in connection with the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31