ITAT held that as the assessee by placing on record the aforesaid documentary evidence had duly discharged the primary onus that was cast upon it, therefore, the A.O without dislodging the same on the basis of any material and/or evidence could not have held the amounts therein received as unexplained cash credit u/s.68 of the Act.
B.B. Verma Vs JCIT (ITAT Raipur) Facts- The assessee firm which is engaged in the business of a contractor had filed its original ROI for the AY 2011-12 on 30.09.2011, declaring an income of Rs.85,46,970/-. The ROI filed by the assessee was processed as such u/s.143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case of the assessee […]
Lahari Laminates Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) With reference to the first issue i.e. incorrect allowance of depreciation of Rs.59,45,940/- on bogus purchase of Plant & Machinery, the learned counsel for the assessee fairy submitted that where the A.O. has made disallowance on Plant & Machinery, it was permissible for the A.O. to disallow […]
Confederation of Pharma Dealers Association Vs CIT (ITAT Raipur) Section 12A Registration cannot be denied merely for Leasing of Developed Plots to Members and Object beneficial to a section of public is also an object of general public utility It is evident that the objects of the assessee trust meant for benefit of pharma dealers […]
Jainarayan Hariram Goel Charitable Trust Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Raipur) We find prima facie merit in the various pleas advanced on behalf of the assessee as narrated above. It is a settled principle of law that the onus lies on the person who alleges untruthfulness against the other persons. In the instant case, the allegation […]
Sanjay Agrawal Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) – Rejection of books, arbitrary income estimation, and legal principles – AY 2012-13.
DCIT Vs Singhania Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Raipur) 1. AO has not made any attempt to rebut the claim of the assessee. The confirmations were filed by the assessee to support the factual position. The assessee has placed the facts which are apparent in nature for which no rebuttal has been done. 2. The Hon’ble […]
Bharat Agro Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) The first allegation concerns infringement of Section 40A(3) of the Act and consequent applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. In this regard, it is the case of the assessee that purchases were made from villagers/Tribals who are procuring the seeds and supplying the same to the assessee. […]
In present facts of the case, it was observed that in the absence of reasons, the jurisdiction assumed under section 148 of the Act to reopen a completed assessment is clearly void ab initio and consequently, assessment order is bad in law.
Held, That The Assessing Officer had conducted enquiry and after various rounds of hearing and deliberation with the assessee and scrutinizing the documents filed before him as well as submissions of the assessee, the Assessing Officer had passed an order.
