Explore the ITAT order rectifying disallowance of EPF & ESIC contributions, diverging from the Checkmate Services judgment. Analysis, implications & more.
ITAT Raipur held that unexplained money u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act was received back through banking channel in the form of sale consideration of the shares. Accordingly, the same has to be brought to tax u/s 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Raipur held that exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act duly denied to trust as audit report in Form 10B e-filed/ uploaded beyond the date specified u/s 139 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Raipur held that addition towards unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act sustained as assessee failed to prove the identity and creditworthiness of lenders of unsecured loans.
ACIT Vs Hotel Ishika (ITAT Raipur) ITAT Raipur held that the interest expenditure corresponding to the advances that was given in the normal course of business could not have been disallowed under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Facts- Post completion of original assessment, as is discernible from record, the A.O on the basis […]
ITAT Raipur held that amount received as a consequence of divorce from the ex-husband could not be held as an unexplained cash credit u/s.68 of the Act, and accordingly cannot be brought to tax u/s.115BBE of the Act.
ITAT Raipur held that assessee failed to put forth the reasonable cause because of which provisions of section 269T of the Income Tax Act was not complied. Accordingly, penalty under section 271E of the Income Tax Act leviable.
ITAT Raipur held that mere non-reference by AO about the cash transaction entered into by the assesse doesn’t render the assessment order passed by AO as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, revisional proceedings u/s 263 unjustified.
ITAT Raipur held that addition as an unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable in as much as the assessee company has duly discharged the onus of proving the identity and creditworthiness of the investor company.
ACIT Vs Mahavir Infracon Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Raipur) Admittedly, it is a matter of fact borne from record that the assessee company which is engaged in the business as that of a developer, had in order to promote its sales incurred expenses towards stamp duty and registration fees with respect to the properties sold by […]
