Follow Us:

ITAT Kolkata

Reopening cannot be done for Mistake committed by AO in Original Assessment

July 3, 2018 4503 Views 1 comment Print

This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals) – 19, Kolkata dated 05.03.2014 and in the solitary ground raised therein, the revenue has challenged the action of the Ld. CIT(A) in cancelling the assessment made by the A.O. under section 143(3) / 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by holding the same to be invalid.

Without any basis AO cannot shift profit from trading to manufacturing activity to disallow deduction u/s 80IE

July 2, 2018 1137 Views 0 comment Print

Aristo Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) It is not in dispute that the assessee had maintained separate books of accounts for trading activity and manufacturing activity. We find that the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 80IE of the Act only in respect of profits derived from manufacturing activity only. It is not in dispute that […]

Section 2(22)(e) not applicable to Current Account Transactions

July 1, 2018 2280 Views 0 comment Print

Provisions of section 2(22)(e) related to deemed dividend are not applicable where the relevant transactions are in the nature of current account transactions and not loans and advances.

Power of AO to change assessee’s status while processing Return and issuing intimation U/s. 143(1)

June 30, 2018 5028 Views 0 comment Print

It is clear from bare reading of section 143(1) that change of status as done by AO does not fall within any of the clauses thereof. Also, it could not be said that change of status of assessee fell within the meaning of expression ‘an incorrect claim apparent from any information in the return’ as laid down in Explanation (a) to section 143(1). Accordingly, intimation issued under section 143(1) changing the status of assessee was not in accordance with law and AO was, therefore, directed to modify the intimation accepting the return of income as it was.

Income from Share cannot be treated as Business merely for Frequent Transactions

June 29, 2018 1242 Views 0 comment Print

DPJ Viniyog Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Assessing Officer treated the income on account of purchase and of shares under the head ‘business income’ instead of under the head ‘capital gain’ as claimed by the assessee. On Appeal CIT(A) held that assessee is making purchase and sale on a continuous basis and besides being […]

Interest u/s 234A not leviable on extended period of Return FIling

June 29, 2018 2028 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Nidhi Packers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Learned counsel for the assessee has contended that the due date of filing of return of income for the year under consideration was extended by the CBDT by a period of 15 days and since the return originally filed by the assessee was within such extended […]

If assessee have sufficient own funds, Interest on borrowed capital cannot be disallowed for Interest free loans to various parties

June 28, 2018 5013 Views 0 comment Print

Moreover, a perusal of the balance sheet of the assessee firm as at 31.03.2012 filed along with the return of income makes it abundantly clear that sufficient own funds in the form of partners capital were available with the assessee firm at the relevant time to give the loans in question free of any interest.

No TDS on Export commission paid to NRI for services rendered abroad

June 27, 2018 27210 Views 0 comment Print

ACIT Vs Lux Industries Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata) Since export commission payments to non-resident agents were not taxable in India, as agents were remaining outside, services were rendered abroad and payments were also made abroad TDS under section 195 was therefore, not deductible from payment made to NRI agents. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT These […]

TDS on fees paid for marketing service rendered outside India

June 26, 2018 55638 Views 1 comment Print

It was submitted by the assessee that the fees were paid for marketing service rendered outside India and hence, did not become chargeable to tax in India requiring tax deduction u/s. 195 of the Act.

Deduction U/s. 36(1)(vii) for Bad debts for income offered to tax during earlier year cannot be disallowed

June 24, 2018 3624 Views 0 comment Print

The very fact that balances were shown under sundry debts itself went to prove that same had emanated out of sales of assessee and hence, income relatable thereto in the form of sales and services had been duly offered to tax in the earlier years in accordance with section 36(2) and therefore, disallowance made towards bad debts was not justified.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031