ITAT Jaipur reinforces section 54F’s applicability, highlighting the distinction between actual sale consideration and stamp duty value for capital gains exemption, affirming the principle of real consideration over deemed value for investment in new assets.
ITAT Jaipur held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit merely because Form 67 was filed after the due date of filing the return under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act is unjustified and untenable in law.
ITAT Jaipur held that penalty u/s 271B not leviable for mere delay of one day as such delay didn’t have any deliberate intention. The delay if any is on account the reasons on the technical letches on the portal and the same is venial in nature.
ITAT Jaipur held that addition by way of adjustment and intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act on debatable and controversial issue is beyond the scope of Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not leviable as addition made on account of meager amount and on account of difference of opinion only.
ITAT Jaipur held that non-compliance due to receipt of notice in SPAM folder is sufficient cause shown for the delay. Accordingly, delay of 223 days in filing of an appeal condoned.
Krishna Das Agarwal Vs DDIT/ADIT (Inv.) (ITAT Jaipur) Black Money Act – Company Is a Separate Legal Entity and The Assessee Cannot Be Held to Be Beneficial Owner Ipso-Facto Due to Majority Shareholding / Directorship.- FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT JAIPUR These bunch of five appeals consist of one appeal filed by the […]
ITAT Jaipur held that there cannot be a second round of penalty for same defaults. Accordingly, penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act for second time is unsustainable.
Shri Keshoraipatan Sahkari Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) We find that the assessment was taken up for scrutiny under CASS to examine the deduction claimed chapter VIA for limited purpose and on this issue, there is finding of the ld. AO in the assessment order. Yet, learned PCIT has subjected the assessment order […]
Voluntary Income declared by assessee on its own i.e. without any detection cannot be considered as equivalent to providing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing particulars of Income
