We hold that in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search with respect to the impugned transaction, the AO did not have any power to make the impugned addition.
DCIT Vs Agya Ram Manohar Lal (ITAT Chandigarh) Facts- The brief facts of the case for AY 2016- 17 are that the assessee firm derives income from business and income from other sources. The assessee firm belongs to M/s Roop Square Group of companies where a search and seizure operation u/s 132(1) was conducted on […]
Valco Industries Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Facts- The assessee originally filed return declaring total income of Rs.4,83,83,620/- on 28.09.2012 after claiming deduction of Rs.5,75,64,789/- u/s 80IC of the Act. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 27.03.2015 at an income of Rs.8,07,03,620/- after making an addition of Rs.3,23,20,000/- on account of […]
Chain Singh Mundra Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) In the instant case, the limited dispute relates to whether the assessee has transferred a residential house or not. On perusal of the Sale Deed executed by the assessee, it is noticed that what has been transferred is an industrial plot No.C-10 alongwith construction thereon situated at Sector […]
Electra Paper and Board Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) In the instant case undisputedly on the date of allotment of shares i.e. 31.3.2016, a balance-sheet was drawn by the assessee albeit the said balance sheet was unaudited on that date. The FMV of the shares was determined on the basis of said balance-sheet. The […]
ITAT Chandigarh allows delay in PF payment. Assessee’s Rs. 4,62,844 paid before return filing. Amendments by Finance Act 2021 are prospective, not retrospective.
Smt. Sarabjit Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) In both the years under consideration, the assessee has declared income from tuition fee in her return of income and in both the years there were cash deposits in the bank account being maintained by the assessee. The Assessing officer added the cash deposits to the income of […]
Sh. Sanjay Jain Vs PCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) In the present set of cases, AO asked the assessees to furnish the relevant details relating to Long Term Capital Gain, Short Term Capital Gain, exemption u/s 10(36) of the Act, deduction u/s 57 of the Act and unsecured loans and the assessees furnished all the relevant documents […]
Neelam Hospital Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Admittedly and undisputedly, the assessee had filed the appeal before the NFAC beyond the period of limitation and there was a delay of 252 days in filing the appeal. However, it is also undisputed that the NFAC did not adjudicate the appeal of the assessee on merits but dismissed […]
Arjun Yadav Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) In the instant case, it is not in dispute that employees’ contribution to ESI and PF had been deposited well before the due date of filing of return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act. We further note that though the ld. CIT(A) has not disputed the various decisions […]
