ITAT Amritsar held that as income of the deceased person offered to tax, credit of TDS cannot be denied merely because it appears in the name of deceased mother. A particular income cannot be taxed twice under the law.
ITAT Amritsar held that loss incurred as amount written off paid against advance of land reflected in column bad & doubtful in ITR is allowable as business loss as genuinity of transaction not questioned.
Sh. Balwinder Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) Ld. A.O cannot blow hot and cold at the same time by partly rejecting the books of accounts and partly accepted the books of accounts, which is bad-in-law. If the AO rejected the books of accounts, then he can’t rely on the same books of accounts for opening […]
J.K. Council for Social Welfare And Information Technology Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Amritsar) Brief fact of the case is that the assessee-society had submitted an application for registration u/s 12A of the Act. The primary object of the assessee is that running and maintaining institutions in rural area, and enhance the poor marginalised youth to […]
iTAT held that issuance of SCN, mentioning proposed additions under 144B(xvi), is a mandatory requirement and any assessment order passed without issuance of SCN is bad in law.
Pathankot Hindu Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar) In this case assessee claimed the loss on diminution value of securities as well as stock. The main grievance of the revenue is that this particular value was not taken in the books of accounts. But factually correct that the circular of the CBDT has […]
ITAT held that appellant having deducted the tax has obligation to file TDS statements within prescribed time limit which she failed to fulfil by filing the statement with delay. Therefore, late fee u/s 234E is justified for delayed period.
ITO Vs Sh. Subash Chander (ITAT Amritsar) It is prayed that all the assessment years need to be considered cumulatively by lower authorities taking into account not only the evidence already on record but also by allowing assessee to provide further evidence in support of his submissions because the entire proceedings have been carried out […]
It is trite law that No addition can be made in the hands of power of attorney holder and further revenue has not brought on record any material evidence indicating that ownership of the said land belongs to appellant assesse. Therefore, we hold that the assessment order is passed without jurisdiction.
Smt. Tajinder Pal Kaur Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) The assessee has challenged both the legal and factual grounds before the Bench. But during the appeal proceedings before the ld. CIT(A), the assessee had not challenged the legal grounds so there are first time challenging the issue before the ITAT. So, the entire legal ground was […]
