ITAT Amritsar

AO cannot be uncertain in penalty order as to concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income

HPCL Mittal Energy Ltd. Vs The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Amritsar)

HPCL Mittal Energy Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Amritsar) The moot question is that what should be the nature of specification of a charge by the AO at the stage of initiation of penalty proceedings and at the time of passing the penalty order. Is the AO required to specify in the penalty notice/order as […]...

Read More

Addition for Cash Deposited in Joint Account cannot be made to an A/c holder if he/she Proves that same belongs to other Joint A/c Holder

Income Tax Officer Vs Harmanpreet Kaur D/o Sadhu Singh (ITAT Amritsar)

The question, however, as we see it, is not the amount at which the land was actually sold, which is in the following year, but whether the cash deposit of Rs.49 lacs could be said to form part of the transaction of sale of land by the assessee’ s father. S...

Read More

ITAT disallows Payment of referral fees paid by Car dealer

M/s. Raga Motors P. Ltd Vs Deputy CIT ( ITAT Amritsar)

This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Jalandhar ('CIT(A)', for short) dated 05.10.2016, partly allowing the assessee’s appeal contesting its assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act', hereinafter) dated 12.10.2015 for Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14...

Read More

Proper Notice U/s. 148 is must for initiating reassessment proceeding

Sh. Shridhar Bedi through Legal Heir Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)

Sh. Shridhar Bedi through Legal Heir Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) Proper notice u/s 148 of the Act for initiating reassessment proceeding is not a mere procedural requirement but the service of the prescribed notice on the assessee is a condition precedent to the validity of any of the reassessment made u/s 147. It is settled […]...

Read More

Section 69B cannot be invoked on mere assumption that there was understatement of investment

Dy. CIT Vs Riar Builders (P) Ltd. (ITAT Amritsar)

Section 69B cannot be invoked on the assumption that there was understatement of the investment, without a finding that the assessee invested more than what was recorded in the books of account....

Read More

Disallowance u/s 14A is to be made despite no tax-free income on investment

Lally Motors India (P.) Ltd. Vs The Pr. CIT (ITAT Amritsar)

Disallowance u/s 14A & Rule 8D has to be made even if the assessee has not earned any tax-free income on the investment. . It was immaterial if dividend income was actually earned or not, which, rather, may be a consideration where the shares, as in the present case, are held to retain control over the investee company, i.e., for strategi...

Read More

CIT(A) cannot cancel order U/s. 127 transferring jurisdiction from one AO to another

The DCIT Vs Shri Subhash Gandhi (ITAT Amritsar)

DCIT  Vs Shri Subhash Gandhi (ITAT Amritsar) An order passed u/s 127 of the Act is not appealable before the Ld. CIT(A). Since the first appellate authority has no jurisdiction to decide the validity or otherwise of an order passed u/s 127, transferring the jurisdiction from one Assessing Officer (AO) to another, it is, but, […]...

Read More

Rejection of application for Registration U/s. 12AA for No beneficiary clause in trust deed

Krishan Kanya Mahavidyalya Vs. CIT(Exemption) (ITAT Amritsar)

Where application for registration certificate was rejected solely on the ground that trust deed did not contain the beneficiary clause; opportunity was given to assessee to make fresh application after incorporating the said clause in the trust deed....

Read More

Compensation paid for loss to clients due to negligence of employees of assessee is allowable expense

Ashwani Financial Services (P.) Ltd. Vs. JCIT (ITAT Amritsar)

Circular No. 35 issued by Board clearly states the losses arising due to negligence of employees has to be allowed as expense if the loss took place in the normal course of the business and the amount involved was necessarily kept for the purpose of business. In the present case, the losses were necessarily incurred in the normal course o...

Read More

Interest u/s 234A/ 234B cannot be levied in absence of any mention in Assessment Order

Income Tax Officer Vs. M/s. Heritage Project (ITAT Amritsar)

In the absence of any specific mention of the Assessing Officer in the assessment order for charging of interest u/s 234A and 234B, no interest would be recovered from the assessee merely by way of a demand notice....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,934)
Company Law (4,138)
Custom Duty (7,110)
DGFT (3,786)
Excise Duty (4,169)
Fema / RBI (3,547)
Finance (3,748)
Income Tax (28,342)
SEBI (2,982)
Service Tax (3,411)

Featured Posts