ITAT Chennai sets aside ex-parte order against Dhaval Patel, allowing a final opportunity for submission of documents and evidences.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside CIT(A) order for lack of fair hearing and non-compliance with natural justice, remands case for fresh adjudication in AY 2016-17.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands case for de novo assessment on non-compliance by assessee, upholding cash payment and transport expense disallowances.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses appeal of Nihar Prabhatbhai Desai as withdrawn following application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024.
Finally, ITAT observed that it is not clear from the order of CIT(A) whether any specific notices on specified dates have been issued to the assessee or service of the notices were properly done or not. CIT (A) did not decide the case on merits.
In the matter above-mentioned ITAT resored the matter to CIT (A) who did not provide opportunity of being heard by way of video conferencing despite request.
Assessee was a illiterate farmer. Assessment was completed by making an addition of Rs. 1,55,00,000/- u/s 69 on account of purchase of immovable property. Assessment order as well as CIT (A) order, dismissing the appeal, were passed ex-parte.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that tax rate u/s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act increased from 30% to 60% and the same is applicable only with effect from 1st April 2017 and not prior to the same. Hence, appeal allowed to that extent.
Denial of registration under section 12AB to a trust engaged in fund-raising activities was not correct as one-time fund raising programme carried out by assessee-trust was not an organized activities in the nature of business akin to selling of lottery tickets.
CIT(A) without looking into the merits of the case and detailed submissions filed by assessee also without considering the CBDT Circular No. 20/2016 dismissed the appeal as time barred. Thus for the casual attitude of the Revenue in dismissing the appeal twice was liable to pay a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to the assessee to meet the ends of justice.
