The ITAT Ahmedabad has remanded a case to the AO to re-examine a taxpayer’s claim for a Section 54B deduction on capital gains from a contingent sale, noting that a critical escrow arrangement was not considered.
The ITAT Ahmedabad bench ruled that loans from current accounts for business purposes cannot be classified as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Learn why this decision matters for inter-company financial transactions.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses a revenue appeal, upholding the deletion of a ₹1.5 crore addition. The tribunal ruled the amount was a loan given, not a cash credit received.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules that capital gains are taxable only upon the execution of a registered sale deed, not a POA, and an AO’s addition in the wrong AY is invalid.
Assessee had recorded the cash deposits as sales in the audited books of account, and no discrepancies were found by AO or CIT(A). Failure to provide PAN alone could not be the sole reason to treat the sales as unexplained money, particularly when Aadhaar details were submitted.
ITAT Ahmedabad provides tax relief to Nirma Ltd., holding sales tax subsidy as a capital receipt, allowing 80IA deduction and depreciation on goodwill.
ITAT Ahmedabad confirms that a belated return does not prevent the carry-forward of unabsorbed depreciation under Section 32(2), a rule distinct from carry-forward of business losses.
The ITAT ruled that the PCIT’s revision order was invalid as the AO had already examined the assessee’s agricultural income claim, thus not acting erroneously.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has ruled that the PCIT cannot initiate a revision to an assessment order based on issues that fall outside the scope of a limited scrutiny.
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that advance tax is only payable on undisputed income, not on disputed additions. A lack of advance tax payment cannot be a precondition for an appeal.
