ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Income Tax Dept’s appeal, ruling that only the 0.7% margin earned on E-top-up sales routed to Vodafone is taxable income under Section 69A.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside GST assessment denial, remanding case for fresh hearing. Court holds non-compliance was due to severe family illness, violating natural justice.
ITAT Ahmedabad upholds PCIT’s Section 263 order, ruling that tax depreciation must comply with Explanation 10 to Section 43(1) and ICDS-VII. Unadjusted Government grants must reduce WDV, regardless of prior acceptance.
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that reopening an assessment u/s 147 is invalid if based on general, unverified portal information lacking a “live link” to the assessee’s escaped income. Case dismissed.
Ahmedabad ITAT rules in Hanumant Pakshighar Charitable trust case, stating 80G approval cannot be denied solely for having a religious object. CIT(E) must verify if religious expenditure exceeds the 5% limit under Section 80G(5B).
Ahmedabad ITAT sets aside the CIT(E)’s rejection of the Fofaria Family Charitable Trust’s application for regular 80G approval.
The ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the deletion of a ₹1.17 Lakh addition made under Section 68 for alleged penny stock gains, ruling that the taxpayer had incurred a Short Term Capital Loss and had not claimed any exempt LTCG u/s 10(38),
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unsecured loan is liable to be deleted since assessee has duly discharged its onus of proving the genuineness of the unsecured loan with documentary evidences. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed to that extent.
Proportionate expenditure against interest income might be allowed to assessee subject to assessee establishing connection between incurring of such expenditure towards earning of interest income from nationalized banks, which was a specific requirement for claim of such expenditure u/s section 57.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that law doesn’t require brought forward additional depreciation from preceding year to be set off against opening WDV of the assets. Thus, revision u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act not sustained as order of AO not erroneous.
