ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unwarranted as the amount represents sales already declared and taxed. Thus, income already offered for taxation cannot be taxed again as unexplained cash credit.
The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on the disallowance of TDS credit to Theo Desh Consultants due to non-inclusion of corresponding income in the relevant assessment year.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands Metro Heritage Pvt Ltd’s case back to CIT(A) due to COVID disruptions and a hotel fire, allowing a fresh opportunity for evidence presentation.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands the Vidhyanagar Jain Society’s registration case to CIT(E) for reconsideration due to non-submission of documents and unavoidable delays.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that merely making a claim that is not sustainable does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Accordingly, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not justified.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the AO must record a proper satisfaction regarding the incorrectness of the assessee’s claim before invoking Rule 8D u/s. 14A. Thus, in absence of such satisfaction, disallowance u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act unsustainable.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that passing of ex-parte order by CIT(A) without adjudicating issues on merits, such order is not sustainable in the eyes of law keeping in view provisions of Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that genuineness of transaction, creditworthiness and identity of creditors not proved, hence addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained credit duly sustained.
ITAT Ahmedabad orders CIT(A) to reconsider the Section 54F exemption claim by Bhupendrabhai Punjabhai Patel after rejecting previous appeal due to non-compliance.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 68 on account of unexplained cash credit, being bogus unsecured loan, and u/s. 69C on account of unexplained expenditure, being bogus interest claimed, unjustified as repayment of loans in subsequent year accepted.
