Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ralsons Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No.110/AHD/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/01/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ralsons Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Introduction: In a notable judgment by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad, the case of Ralsons Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) has thrown light on the critical aspect of revenue recognition in the real estate sector. This ruling, relevant to the Assessment Year 2016-17, underscores the principle that the method of revenue recognition adopted by a taxpayer, once established and accepted in prior and subsequent years, should not be disturbed without substantial cause.

Detailed Analysis: Ralsons Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., engaged in real estate development, filed its return for AY 2016-17, declaring a loss. The PCIT, upon review, considered the assessment under Section 143(3) erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, primarily challenging the method of revenue recognition and an alleged excess claim of TDS credit.

The tribunal meticulously examined the arguments and evidence presented, including the assessee’s consistent application of the revenue recognition method as per Accounting Standard 7, recognized by both the Income Tax Act and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). The ITAT found that the assessee had consistently recognized revenue based on the percentage completion method, a practice accepted in the assessments for AYs 2014-15 and 2015-16. Furthermore, the tribunal noted that the entire revenue from the real estate project was duly accounted for over the years, negating the PCIT’s concerns of prejudice to the Revenue.

On the issue of TDS credit, the ITAT observed that the PCIT’s claim of excessive credit lacked basis since the credit had not been utilized in the previous year and the entire transaction was tax neutral. The tribunal also addressed the non-contested issue related to unsecured loans, underscoring that it did not form part of the appeals due to the absence of any addition in the consequential order by the AO.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031