Saireddy Pruthviraj Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) It is pleaded by the assessee before us that while receiving the flat No. 914, the mother of the assessee valued the same at Rs. 27,23,000/-and offered to tax the capital gains arising therefrom. On this premise the assessee insists that the cost of acquisition of plot No. […]
Explore the ITAT Hyderabad ruling in Sri Narsimha Reddy Pindi vs ITO case. Understand how past savings from rental and agricultural income validated the demonetization period cash deposit.
Expenditure incurred by the assessee was not merely philanthropic, but also had a business angle, therefore, deduction was allowable to assessee under section 37.
Lateef Abdul Mohd. successfully challenges ITAT Hyderabad decision on cash deposit addition during demonetization, citing sales correspondence and legal precedent.
The document impounded herein is duly supported by all the correct entries as per assessee’s stand itself, addition u/s 68 tenable
Vivimed Labs Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) hon’ble apex court’s landmark decision in CIT Vs. Sinhaghad Technical Educational Society (2017) 84 com 290 (SC) that no such proceedings initiated u/s 153A of the Act sustainable in law for want of incriminating material found or seized during the course of search. We make it clear that […]
GSR Ventures Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Once any TDS is effected in accordance with the provisions of the Act and paid to the Central Government, such an amount shall be treated as a payment of tax on behalf of the person from whose income the deduction was made, and, therefore, a credit of […]
Dr. Kalpana Alexander Vs. ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) There is nothing to contradict the opinion of the learned PCIT that there is failure on the part of the learned Assessing Officer to make the minimum enquiry, let alone sufficient enquiry on this aspect. Assessment order held erroneous. Facts- The assessee is an individual, and a medical […]
Dy.CIT Vs Sembcorp Energy India Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) Applicability of section 56(2)(viib) is only in a case where the shares are issued at a premium by a company in which public are not substantially interested. Facts- During the course of assessment proceedings, it was craved before AO that price at which the shares were issued […]
DCIT Vs Hyderabad Educational Institutions Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Hyderabad) The tuition fee is received in the last quarter of a financial year, however, the corresponding service is rendered by the assessee in the next quarter which falls in a different financial year. Accordingly, held that income accrues only when the right accrued by rendering of […]
