Case Law Details
Case Name : Dr. Kalpana Alexander Vs. ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dr. Kalpana Alexander Vs. ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
There is nothing to contradict the opinion of the learned PCIT that there is failure on the part of the learned Assessing Officer to make the minimum enquiry, let alone sufficient enquiry on this aspect. Assessment order held erroneous.
Facts-
The assessee is an individual, and a medical practitioner at M/s. Matrika Hospital, Hyderabad. For the AY.2015-16, she filed her ROI declaring an income of Rs.46,80,710. It was noticed that the assessee did not declare any income towards capital gains, after claiming deduction of Rs.37,27,774 u/s. 54 of the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

