Gujarat High Court grants bail in the alleged GST scam of Rs. 1466 crores. Detailed analysis of Hitesh Prabhudas Lodhiya’s case against the State of Gujarat.
Dive into the Gujarat High Court judgment quashing Mitesh Sejpals bail. Analysis of legal arguments, court considerations, and implications of the ruling.
Chandreshbhai Jayantibhai Patel Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court): Notice issued to a dead person under Section 148 cannot be continued against the legal representative unless the legal representative submits to jurisdiction without raising objections
Krishnaawtar Kabra L/H of Jagannath Rampal Kabra Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) In a recent judgment, the Gujarat High Court addressed the issue of the validity of a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to a deceased assessee. The court ruled that the reopening of the assessment based on such […]
Understand how the Gujarat High Court recently addressed the legality of issuing a notice Section 148 of the Income Tax Act in the name of a deceased taxpayer with this blog post.
Explore the recent Gujarat High Court case involving Dharmdeep Commodities Pvt. Ltd. and the State of Gujarat, addressing challenges in claiming GST refunds due to technical issues with the GSTN portal.
In a recent ruling, the Gujarat High Court has echoed the Supreme Courts decision in the case of Union of India and Others vs. Ashish Agarwal, wherein it addressed a group of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Notification No. 20/2021 dated 31.03.2021 as well as Notification No. 38/2021 dated 27.04.2021 and consequential notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
Gujarat High Court rules that authorities must adhere to court directions. Analysis of Real Price Spintex vs Union of India case.
Petitioner challenged notice on grounds of violating principles of natural justice, citing vagueness and lack of specificity. Court, echoing its earlier decisions upheld the need for detailed and specific show-cause notices.
Gujarat High Court held that charge in favour of secured creditor would precede over the unsecured creditor. Thus, secured creditor will have first charge over the property as against State Government (crowns debt).
