The Gujarat High Court has granted leave to appeal a trial court’s acquittal in a ₹6 lakh cheque bounce case, citing a prima facie failure to properly appreciate evidence presented by the complainant.
Gujarat High Court held that rejection of declaration in Form No. 1 under DTVSV Scheme, 2024 since manual appeal is filed by NRI petitioner is not justifiable. Accordingly, communication rejecting declaration in From N0. 1 quashed and set aside.
Gujarat High Court held that reassessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed since income earned in NRE Account is exempt under section 10(4)(ii) of the Act and hence there is no question of escapement of income.
Gujarat High Court rules tax cannot be recovered from employees when employer fails to deposit deducted TDS; directs CBDT to enforce Section 205 compliance.
Gujarat High Court rules that GST payment credited to government via electronic cash ledger satisfies bail condition; rejects plea for bail cancellation.
Gujarat High Court held that provisions of Section 13 of the Income Tax Act can be invoked only at the time of assessment and not at the time of grant of registration under Section 12A of the Act. Accordingly, writ disposed as devoid of merits.
An assessment order passed in the name of a non-existent entity, such as a company that has been amalgamated into another, was a fundamental jurisdictional error and was null and void from the beginning.
The Gujarat High Court has issued notice to the Union of India, demanding an explanation for not extending the Income Tax Return (ITR) filing due date under Section after extending the Tax Audit Report deadline under Section to October . The court relied on its previous ruling in the All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants case, which established that the two dates are inextricably linked and must be the same.
Gujarat High Court held that claim of exemption of Long Term Capital Gain under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act cannot be held to be bogus on the basis of presumption in absence of any corroborative evidence. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
The Gujarat High Court ruled in MC Bauchemie that a discrepancy between E-way bill turnover and GSTR-9 turnover is insufficient alone to invoke GST demand proceedings under Section 73. Authorities must establish fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression to assume jurisdiction.
