Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Subscription Books Submit Post
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax Subjective Difference Insufficient for Section 263 Revision: Gujarat HC Income Tax SC Dismisses Section 263 Challenge Where AO Had Conducted Inquiry and Verification Income Tax ITAT Hyderabad Allows Bad Debt Write-Off by Co-operative Bank Despite State Government Guarantee Income Tax Delhi HC Sets Aside ITAT Remand on NDTV Corporate Guarantee Issue Income Tax Telangana HC Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Order After IBC Resolution Plan Approval Income Tax Madras HC Upholds Section 148 Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16 as Within Limitation Income Tax Madras HC Upholds Section 148 Reassessment Notice for AY 2013-14 as Timely Corporate Law IRDAI Warns Pramerica Life Over FY25 EoM Limit Breach
Archive

Courts: CESTAT Mumbai

745 articles
Excise DutyNICHOLAS PIRAMEL (I) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (CESTAT MUMBAI)
Excise Duty

NICHOLAS PIRAMEL (I) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (CESTAT MUMBAI)

TG Team18 years ago
Service TaxEmployment of outdoor caterer for providing catering services has to be considered as an input service
Service Tax

Employment of outdoor caterer for providing catering services has to be considered as an input service

TG Team18 years ago
Service TaxCenvat credit availed during the period 01/01/2005 to 15/06/2005 on the basis of TR-6 challans, which were used for payment of Service Tax on the services received from GTA, is admissible
Service Tax

Cenvat credit availed during the period 01/01/2005 to 15/06/2005 on the basis of TR-6 challans, which were used for payment of Service Tax on the services received from GTA, is admissible

TG Team19 years ago