Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kagal Nagar Parishad Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kagal Nagar Parishad Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

Revenue sought to tax the one time premium deposit, which is not refundable under the head of renting of immovable property service considering the same as rent. We find that there is a separate charge for the rent, which alone is taxable, the onetime premium charges is non-refundable deposit, it is called as one time premium and not part of rent. Therefore, the same is not taxable.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT OR

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2025
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031