Follow Us:

CESTAT Delhi

Service Tax Not Applicable on Payments for Police Deployment: CESTAT Delhi

April 16, 2025 693 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi rules on AVVNL’s service tax dispute involving police support, employee penalties, and tender non-compliance. Partial relief granted.

No Service Tas on Amount Recovered Towards Penalties: CESTAT Delhi

April 11, 2025 588 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi rules penalty amounts for contract breaches are not ‘services’ under Finance Act, thus not liable to service tax.

MCPCBs Classifiable as LED Components Under CTH 85340000, Not Lighting Fixtures Under CTH 94054090

April 9, 2025 1353 Views 0 comment Print

Aggrieved by this decision, assessee appealed to Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), who ruled in its favor, restoring the original classification under CTH 85340000 and setting aside the penalty and confiscation order.

CESTAT Delhi upheld duty demand on student almanac and teacher planner for normal period

April 8, 2025 333 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that duty demand on Student Almanac and teacher planner is uphold, however, extended period of limitation is not invocable since there was no evidence of intention to evade payment of duty and suppression of facts.

Exemption notification 146/94-Cus doesn’t impose ‘Actual User’ condition: CESTAT Delhi

April 8, 2025 744 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that exemption notification 146/94-Cus doesn’t state ‘Actual User’ condition. Accordingly, confiscation of imported arms and ammunitions is liable to be set aside.

NIDB data cannot form the basis for Enhancement of Value under Customs Act

April 3, 2025 1032 Views 0 comment Print

The aforementioned action by assessee implied that assessee had accepted the reassessment and enhancement. Consequently, the appropriate officer was not supposed to issue a speaking order in accordance with Section 17(5) of the Customs Act.

Customs Broker not required to verify correctness of certificates issued by government officer

April 1, 2025 1518 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that regulation 10(n) doesn’t mandate Customs Broker to verify correctness of certificate or registration issued by other concerned government officer. Thus, revocation of customs broker licence and forfeiture of security deposit are set aside.

Customs Broker not responsible if client fails to inform authorities post moving to new premises

March 26, 2025 3243 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that responsibility of the Customs Broker under Regulation 10(n) does not include keeping a continuous surveillance on the client. Thus, customs broker cannot be held responsible if client moves to new premises and doesn’t inform authorities.

Customs Officer not empowered to modify FOB value of goods: CESTAT Delhi

March 26, 2025 906 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that FOB value is the transaction value and customs officer has no right to interfere/ modify the FOB value of the goods. Thus, appeal of exporter’s allowed and order set aside.

Notification no. 36/2021-Customs doesn’t have retrospective effect: CESTAT Delhi

March 26, 2025 861 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that Amendment Notification no. 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021 cannot be said to be retrospective in nature. Accordingly, orders are liable to be set aside and all the appeals are allowed.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031