Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ravi Dhanwariya Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ravi Dhanwariya Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT Delhi held that regulation 10(n) doesn’t mandate Customs Broker to verify correctness of certificate or registration issued by other concerned government officer. Thus, revocation of customs broker licence and forfeiture of security deposit are set aside. Facts- M/s. Ravi Dhanwariya, New Delhi, is a proprietorship firm licensed as a Customs Broker under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations. On 28.10.2021 and 29.10.2021, the appellant filed six shipping bills on behalf of M/s Sharp Enterprises to export goods. Receiving int...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930