The assessee’s application, which was filed on 9-2-2017, was rejected by the Assistant Commissioner and later by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the grounds that it was submitted beyond the six-month deadline stipulated under Section 102(3) of the Act.
Delhi CESTAT in the abovementioned matter set-aside order confirming suspension of custom broker license of the appellant and directed that the original license and all the F/G/H cards, if already surrendered to the Customs, shall be returned to the appellant.
The CESTAT Delhi has ruled in favor of Rambagh Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd., allowing full Cenvat credit on management consultancy services, citing judicial precedents.
CESTAT Delhi upheld the inclusion of metal lease charges in assessable value since the same was paid as a condition of sale and not paid in nature of interest. Accordingly, differential duty demand confirmed.
In the present case, the revenue has merely re-assessed the value on the basis of the statement of Shri Jhunjhunwala, which is not the prescribed requirement for reassessment of the value of the imported goods.
CESTAT Delhi cancels a ₹2 crore penalty on Rajesh Khosla, former MMTC-Pamp MD, ruling that mere non-disclosure without deliberate intent to evade customs duty is insufficient for Section 112(a)(ii) penalty.
CESTAT Delhi held that when the Duty Free Scrips are forged, the importer cannot be permitted to take plea that they were not involved in fraud or forgery. Accordingly, appeal dismissed and duty demand confirmed.
The decisions also hold that if the data is not stored in the computer but officers take out a printout from the hard disk drive by connecting it to the computer, then a certificate under section 36B of the Central Excise Act is mandatory.
Delhi CESTAT rules ‘Take-Away’ and ‘Home Delivery’ from restaurants are sales, not taxable services. Sets aside demand against Bikanervala Foods. Cites precedents.
CESTAT Delhi held that imposition of penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 not justified since revenue failed to establish direct involved of Customs Broker in mis-declaration of imported goods. Accordingly, appeal allowed and penalty deleted.
