This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty u/s. 112(a) set aside as direct involved of Customs Broker in mis-declaration not established
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- HIM Logistics Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
HIM Logistics Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Delhi held that imposition of penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 not justified since revenue failed to establish direct involved of Customs Broker in mis-declaration of imported goods. Accordingly, appeal allowed and penalty deleted.
Facts- The appellant is, inter-alia engaged in the business of the clearance of the import and export consignments. Notably, the appellant filed the Bill of Entry dated 27.09.2014 on behalf of the importer viz., M/s. Jagdamba Enterprises declaring the items as per the...
Author Info
