CESTAT Allahabad held that penalty imposable for the act of smuggling of battery scrap by concealing the same with plastic scrap through un-notified route from Nepal. Accordingly, penalty upheld and appeal dismissed.
CESTAT Allahabad held that customs duty leviable on manufacturing of stainless steel coils under Advance Authorisation Scheme is exempt. Accordingly, appellant is entitled to refund of CVD paid on the same.
CESTAT Allahabad held that material imported based MOEF permission by a company cannot be diverted to any other unit for any purpose other than one stated in permission letter.
The CESTAT ruled that interest on refundable pre-deposits is mandatory, regardless of whether it’s claimed, in the India Yamaha Motor Pvt. Ltd. case.
Where preferential location charges charged by the builder includible in the taxable value of the service tax levy and no separate charge was levied, the liability to pay service tax did not arise as it was only when a particular service was separately charged that the liability to pay service tax arose.
Explore the Daurala Sugar Works vs. Commissioner of Central GST case, focusing on bagasse’s non-dutiable status and CENVAT credit implications under Rule 6(3) of CCR, 2004.
Explore the CESTAT Allahabad order on Ratan Textiles Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs, discussing the absence of a time limit under Section 27 for refunding customs penalty and redemption fines.
CESTAT Allahabad rules that screening films in multiplexes is not a Business Support Service, quashing service tax demand on PVS Multiplex India Pvt. Ltd.
In Kancor Ingredients Ltd vs Commissioner (CESTAT Allahabad), the court rules that accumulated Cenvat Credit refund is valid for goods exported without a bond.
CESTAT Allahabad quashes service tax demand on Indus Valley Partners, ruling classification based on non-existing provision is bad in law.
