Case Law Details
Case Name : Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Allahabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Allahabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Tinna Rubber & Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Allahabad)
CESTAT Allahabad held that material imported based MOEF permission by a company cannot be diverted to any other unit for any purpose other than one stated in permission letter. Accordingly, goods liable for confiscation u/s. 111(d) of the Customs Act on account of diversion.
Facts- Appellant imported two consignments of old and used cut tiers in 2 & . 3 Pcs. (arisen from old/used tires) for clearance to their Pan pat Unit. These B/Es were assessed and marked for examinat
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.