Case Law Details
Indus Valley Partners (India) Pvt Ltd Vs Principal Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Allahabad)
In this case between Indus Valley Partners (India) Pvt Ltd and the Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, the issue revolves around the classification of services provided by Indus Valley Partners (IVP) US and Bijesh Amin Consulting Corporation (BACS). The tax authorities treated these services as “Business Auxiliary Services” and demanded service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. However, the appellant argued that these services should be classified as “intermediary services” and thus not taxable in India.
The appellate tribunal analyzed the agreements between the parties and concluded that the services provided by IVP US and BACS fell under the category of “intermediary services.” They noted that intermediary services involve three or more parties and include arranging or facilitating the provision of services or goods between these parties. In this case, IVP US and BACS were acting on behalf of the appellant to promote their products and services in the US and other parts of the world, making their services intermediaries.
Moreover, the tribunal observed that the demand for service tax was made based on the classification of services under the “Business Auxiliary Service” category, which was omitted from the Finance Act from July 1, 2012. Therefore, relying on a non-existing provision for classification was deemed legally incorrect.
Furthermore, the tribunal highlighted the principle of revenue neutrality, stating that since the appellant was a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit and was availing CENVAT credit for taxes paid on input services, there was no net gain to the government exchequer from the service tax demand. Several precedents were cited to support the argument that in cases of revenue neutrality, no penalty or interest should be imposed.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
