CESTAT Allahabad

Parle 2-in-1 Eclairs & Kismi Toffee are neither chocolate nor bubble gum: CESTAT

M/s Marko Foods & Shri Naman Mandhyan, Partner Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Allahabad)

Items falling under Chapter 170490 are entitled for exemption under Sugar Confectionary (excluding white chocolate and bubble gum). Admittedly, the goods manufactured by the appellants (Parle 2-in-1 Eclairs & Kismi Toffee ) are Sugar Confectionary is neither chocolate nor bubble gum....

Read More

Customs officers have no jurisdiction to seize goods in SEZ

Shri Imran Ahmed Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Allahabad)

We hold that the Customs officers have no jurisdiction on the appellant to seize the goods in S.E.Z. area therefore seizure of the goods in question is set aside. Consequently, no demand can be confirmed against the appellants. Therefore the confiscation of the impugned goods is also set aside....

Read More

No Service Tax on sell of study material to students of coaching centers

M/s Smart Value Products & Services Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Allahabad)

M/s Smart Value Products & Services Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Allahabad) Facts of the case are not in dispute that the coaching centers are registered coaching center and provide services to their students. The coaching centers are also private limited companies and having separate identity known ...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,826)
Company Law (4,000)
Custom Duty (7,030)
DGFT (3,741)
Excise Duty (4,154)
Fema / RBI (3,502)
Finance (3,712)
Income Tax (27,873)
SEBI (2,932)
Service Tax (3,393)

Featured Posts