Calcutta High Court quashed Section 148/148A notices and orders for A.Y. 2020-21, noting that the assessing officer issued notices in the name of deceased Chiranjilal Agarwala instead of the legal heir, making the proceedings unsustainable.
Calcutta High Court orders a GST appellate authority to re-examine a company’s claim for Input Tax Credit on bank charges after new evidence was presented.
The Calcutta High Court has set aside a GST demand against P.G. Exim, remanding the case for fresh adjudication after the company claimed earlier proceedings were dropped without their knowledge.
The Calcutta High Court has stayed a GST demand against P.G. Exim, citing the lack of a constituted Appellate Tribunal for the company to file an appeal.
Calcutta High Court held that petitioner/ buyer cannot be saddled with tax component for failure on the part of BSNL/ supplier. Accordingly, BSNL authorities are accordingly directed to pay the same and writ petition is disposed of.
Calcutta High Court held that delay of 180 days in filing of an appeal before Tribunal condoned since Tribunal is the last fact finding authority and delay of 180 days cannot be stated to be inordinate nor the assessee can be stated to have been not diligent in prosecuting matter.
Calcutta High Court held that DRAT order dismissing appeal of MSME upheld since MSME did not avail of the facilities and allowed the Securitization and Reconstruction of financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 to run its course, then it is not entitled to any protection.
Calcutta High Court remands GST appeal as assessee claims unawareness of SCN uploaded under “Additional Notices and Orders,” ordering appellate authority review.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed a revision application by the state against a GST appellate order, ruling that the authorities cannot expand the scope of the original show-cause notice.
Assessee was entitled to refund of ₹7.98 crore as once a protest was lodged, it was upon the customs authorities to dispose of it by a speaking, appealable order, failing which, the protest could not be deemed to have lapsed.
