In re Ms. Kerala State Construction Corporation Ltd. (GST AAR Kerala) The GST rate applicable for Centage charges / Consultancy charges. The Centage Charges / Consultancy Charges received by the applicant in respect of the works at Si Nos. (1) to (4) above being in relation to pure services provided to the State Government by […]
(i) Whether the process and treatment carried out on the goods belonging to the principal and made available by the principal amounts to job work? Yes. Manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by the principal is treated as service by way of job work and is covered under SAC 9988.
The work of design, realisation, integration and commissioning of Trisonic Wind Tunnel as a turnkey project falls under the category of Works Contract and is taxable @ 12% GST.
In re M/s. Viliram Sarabhai Space Centre (GST AAR Kerala) Vikram Sarabhai Space Center –The work of design, realisation, integration and commissioning of Trisonic Wind Tunnel as a turnkey project falls under the category of Works Contract and is taxable @ 12% GST. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING GST AAR KERALA […]
In re M/s. Colortone Process Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Kerala) Will the service of printing work carried out by the applicant come within the purview of service of printing of pictures as covered under Cir.No.84/03/2019-GST dated 01,01.2019. The colour printing of images from digital media is covered under Service Classification Code 998386 and taxable at […]
The Kerala Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) recently held that the services provided by diagnostic centre is a clinical establishment and providing Health Care Service therefore exempted from GST.
In re Jaya Lakshmi Tobacco Company (GST AAAR Andhra Pradesh) Appellant requested for withdrawal of application in the context of cancellation of registration. Appeal dismissed. M/s. Jayalakshrni Tobacco Company in their letter dated 13-02-2019 stated that they had applied for cancellation of registration and they no longer required any ruling and requested to consider their […]
In re Divisional Forest Officer (GST AAAR Andhra Pradesh) On verification of the application filed by the applicant ,the following procedural lapses are noticed : The applicant failed to comply with the provisions of Rule 106 of the APGST Act which reads as under: Rule 106: Form & Manner of appeal to the appellate authority […]
In re Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld the ruling given by the Advance Ruling Authority by observing that since the Appellant has raised questions on the admissibility of the credit of the service tax and VAT paid under the pre-GST regime, it is held that neither […]
In re Concepts India (GST AAR Haryana) In light of the above discussion, the Authority for Advance Ruling holds that the product manufactured and supplied by the applicant i.e. PP non-woven bags are covered under Heading 3923 in the sub-heading 3923 29 90 (other) and taxable at 18% (9% CGST and 9% HGST). FULL TEXT […]
