Allahabad High Court

TDS not deductible on Payment made for conduct of exam through affiliated centers

Pr. CIT (Central) Vs M/s. M.P. Biscuits Pvt. Ltd (Allahabad High Court)

In the absence of any material to establish that the affiliated colleges/centres were rendering services of professional or technical nature in the matter of conducting the University's examination, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal has not committed any error of law in holding that the tax was not deductable on such reimbursement u...

Read More

FIR can be lodged under Code of Criminal Procedure for GST offences

Govind Enterprises Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)

The contention of the petitioner  that no FIR report can be lodged under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure for offences punishable under the IPC, as  proceeding could only be drawn against him under the U.P. GST Act,  2017, is  rejected....

Read More

No Stay on arrest for GST evasion; FIR Maintainable: Allahabad HC

Govind Enterprises Vs State of U.P.  (Allahabad High Court)

Govind Enterprises Vs State of U.P.  (Allahabad High Court) Thrust of the allegations made in the impugned FIR is that the dealer fraudulently, with a dishonest intention, by submitting false documents, with an intention to evade taxes, obtained registration, thereafter, took inward supply and passed on the goods to end users, without ge...

Read More

Advertisement Tax post GST imposed by Nagar Nigam is illegal: HC

Selvel Media Services Pvt Ltd Vs State of UP  (Allahabad High Court)

Demand of tax on advertisement from the petitioners after 1.7.2017 is held to be illegal and without jurisdiction. Notices of demand impugned in the petition are quashed and the amount, if any, of the advertisement tax deposited by the petitioners for the period 1.7.2017 onwards is directed to be refunded to the petitioners. ...

Read More

Constitute GST Tribunal in Lucknow within 3 months: HC

Oudh Bar Asso. Vs U.O.I. (Allahabad High Court)

Oudh Bar Asso. Vs U.O.I. (Allahabad High Court) In the present case, the legislation, namely, GST Act, 2017 has been enacted and has come into force with effect from 01.07.2017. Under the said enactment, various authorities have to be set up, namely, GST Council, and the GST Council was authorised to make recommendations to the […]...

Read More

Section 194I: Rent for use of Land includes lease, sub-lease, tenancy payment

CIT (TDS) Vs Jaypee Sports International Ltd. (Allahabad High Court)

CIT (TDS) Vs Jaypee Sports International Ltd. (Allahabad High Court) Word ‘rent’ means any payment by whatever name called under any lease, sub-lease, tenancy or any other agreement or arrangement for the use of any land and came to the conclusion that lease money or annual rent is rent within the meaning of section 194-I [&he...

Read More

GST exempt on sale from Duty Free shops; Accumulated unutilized ITC refundable

Atin Krishna Vs U.O.I. (Allahabad High Court)

GST on goods supplied to and from Duty Free Shops is rightly conferred and the claims of any accumulated unutilized ITC are refundable to respondent....

Read More

GST: Vehicle cannot be detained if No Tax Evasion and Valid documents

Avtar Trading Co. Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)

Avtar Trading Co. Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the opposite parties in most arbitrary and illegal manner have detained the vehicle as well as the goods. There is no contravention of the provisions and there is no evasion of tax. The driver of the vehicle was […]...

Read More

Allow manual or Online filing of TRAN-1: HC

M/s. Gupta Agencies Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)

Respondents are directed to open the portal before 31st of March 2019. In the event they do not do so, they will entertain the GST TRAN-1 of the petitioner manually and pass orders on it after due verification of the credits as claimed by the petitioner. They will also ensure that the petitioner is allowed to pay its taxes on the regular ...

Read More

GST: Dept should have awaited outcome of challenge made to search by petitioner before passing confiscation order

Rimjhim Ispat Limited Vs State Of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)

Rimjhim Ispat Limited Vs State Of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Coming to the question of the validity of the confiscation order passed under Section 130 of the UPGST Act and challenged by the petitioner by means of an amendment application filed. The perusal of the said confiscation order (Annexure-10 to the writ petition) reveals that [&h...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,184)
Company Law (4,840)
Custom Duty (7,325)
DGFT (3,955)
Excise Duty (4,225)
Fema / RBI (3,780)
Finance (3,963)
Income Tax (30,279)
SEBI (3,152)
Service Tax (3,460)