Follow Us:

All ITAT

Delay of 32 days was explained satisfactorily: ITAT remanded matter to CIT (A)

January 6, 2025 831 Views 0 comment Print

In the case abovementioned ITAT remanded the matter to CIT (A) after observing that delay of 32 days was explained satisfactorily. Assessee was salaried employee and not used to the proceedings of income-tax litigation.

Inadequate enquiry not give any right to CIT to revise assessment order: ITAT Surat

January 6, 2025 702 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT considered two issues on this aspect. Firstly, whether PCIT rightly exercised its revisional jurisdiction and secondly whether order u/s 263 was passed on merits regarding to the net foreign exchange gain.

Revision order u/s 263 was passed in name of deceased assessee: ITAT set-aside order

January 6, 2025 585 Views 0 comment Print

During the pendency of assessment proceedings assessee died and notice u/s. 142(1) dated 12.03.2022 has been issued to legal heir/representative of the assessee as per provisions u/s. 159.

Mechanical Approval Under Section 153D Without entry in Order Sheet is Fatal

January 6, 2025 1245 Views 0 comment Print

Mechanical approval under Section 153D invalidates assessment orders, per ITAT Delhi in Kavita Jain vs DCIT. Analysis of procedural lapses and judicial precedents.

No additions could be made merely on basis of statement u/s 132(4) without incriminating evidence

January 6, 2025 2715 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee could not have been subjected to additions in case of search/survey operations merely on basis of statement recorded under section 132(4) unless and until some corroborative evidence was found in support of such admission.

No assessment u/s 153C as satisfaction note was not recorded for relevant search assessment years

January 6, 2025 774 Views 0 comment Print

The company contended that the satisfaction note required to initiate the assessment under section 153C was recorded by AO only on January 18, 2021, making the search year AY 2021-22.

No revision u/s 263 on the basis of “Borrowed Satisfaction”

January 6, 2025 537 Views 0 comment Print

In response to the notice under Section 263, assessee argued that the issue had already been examined during reassessment proceedings and that the AO had taken a plausible legal view.

E-Invoicing Software Solutions provided to Indian Company was taxable as “Fee For Technical Services” (FTS) u/s 5 (2)

January 4, 2025 1347 Views 0 comment Print

In the event and income sourced in India was not characterized under the heads provided in the DTAA, the income would be taxable under the residual clause provided taxing right was allocated to source country in this case to India under the relevant DTAA.

Allowability of 50% of claimed indexed construction costs due to lack of sufficient evidence

January 4, 2025 2655 Views 0 comment Print

Denial of the entire expenditure incurred towards as cost of construction by AO could not be held to be justified even if assessee did not submit satisfactory bills/vouchers in support of her claim towards the cost of construction.

Hire Charges of vessel did not constitute ‘Royalty’ under India-Singapore DTAA as it was business income

January 4, 2025 1026 Views 0 comment Print

Hire charges of a vessel did not constitute ‘Royalty’ as it was in the nature of business income and as there was no Permanent Establishment therefore, no taxability arose on account of business income.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930