During the assessment proceedings, it was observed that the assessee sold two trademarks “Coldarin” and “Raricap”. The gains accrued on the transfer of both these capital assets gave rise to income chargeable to tax under the head “Capital Gains”.
ITAT Hyderabad held that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act is rightly deleted by CIT(A) since assessee has not earned any dividend income. Thus, when there is no dividend income, the provisions of section 14A are not applicable.
ITAT Nagpur held that addition under section 69C towards unexplained expenditure is liable to be deleted due to lack of corroborative and strong evidence. Accordingly, appeal of the department dismissed.
ITAT Nagpur held that cultivation of mushroom falls within the purview of agriculture and hence income from sale of mushroom is agricultural income which is eligible for exemption under section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur’s ruling on Kailash Chand vs ITO case, analyzing tax assessment, additions, and legal compliance under Section 144 & 147 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur sends Puneet Singhvi’s capital gains case back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh review after the assessee failed to appear in earlier proceedings.
While a best judgment assessment can involve some arbitrariness, it must be an honest and fair estimate based on available material and circumstances, not capricious.
ITAT Jaipur sets aside Resonance Eduventures assessment orders, citing mechanical approval by Addl. CIT without proper application of mind as mandated under Section 153D.
ITAT Jaipur ruling on Parshavnath Buildestate Pvt Ltd vs ACIT regarding unexplained expenditures under Section 69C and taxation under Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur addressed tax deductions under Sections 54F & 54B in Kuldeep Singh Shekhawat vs. ITO, ruling on belated filings and capital gains exemptions.
