ITAT Ahmedabad held that issue of applicability of section 115JB to National Dairy Development Board is debatable and not a mistake apparent from record hence rectification order passed is beyond the scope of section 154 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that goodwill arose from the excess of consideration over the net value of tangible assets transferred in amalgamation and was therefore a valid intangible asset eligible for depreciation under section 32(1)(ii).
ITAT Hyderabad remands Mahindra University’s 80G application to CIT(E), citing arbitrary rejection despite prior 10(23C)(vi) approval for charitable education.
An assessee’s appeal against a 2018-19 tax assessment regarding unexplained receipts from a foreign loan repayment. This case details the arguments, evidence presented, and the final decision.
ITAT Delhi overturns Rs. 74 lakh penalty on Singh Consultancy. Notice ambiguity in Section 271(1)(c) proceedings deemed fatal, reinforcing clarity in tax charges.
The assessee is public charitable trust established vide trust deed dated 1st September 2024 with the stated object to build, restore, renovate, and maintain places of worship, historical monuments, pilgrimage sites, and public places of faith and belief.
Since the assessments were completed in the case of assesee and there was no incriminating material found during the search in the case of the assessee, the additions made under Section 153A were unsustainable.
ITAT Mumbai recently ruled on the taxability of enhanced compensation received under interim court orders, clarifying Section 45(5)(b) of Income Tax Act.
Geecee Ventures Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai, in the case of Geecee Ventures Limited Vs. DCIT, has delivered a significant ruling on two key areas of income tax law: the allowance of deduction under Section 80-IA and the computation of disallowance under Section 14A. The decision, pronounced on May […]
Tribunal directs full TDS credit for K. Venkatesan (HUF) on Rs. 10.5 Cr agricultural land sale. Overturns CPC/CIT(A) denial, citing Section 194IA and Rule 37BA misapplication.