Delhi ITAT rules against Section 271(1)(b) penalty for non-compliance when the assessment is ultimately completed under Section 143(3) without additions.
The ITAT Ahmedabad restored Bhatt Mewada Brahm Samaj’s 80G application, deeming the rejection premature due to lack of opportunity for submission, highlighting a violation of natural justice.
ITAT Surat deleted a Section 271(1)(c) penalty against Gunjan Agarwal, ruling that an addition based on estimated income does not automatically imply concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.
The ITAT Surat deleted a Section 271-I penalty against Gopal Chandak for non-filing of Form 15CA on non-taxable remittances, citing that rules were notified late.
ITAT Pune quashes Section 271(1)(c) penalty on Intervalve Poonawalla for leave encashment disallowance, citing full disclosure and judicial precedents.
The ITAT Delhi partially allowed the Revenue’s appeal against Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd, making a lump-sum addition of ₹5 lakh for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization.
The ITAT Delhi has directed the NFAC to apply the peak credit theory and allow set-off against agricultural income for unexplained cash deposits in the reassessment of Shakti Singh.
Ahmedabad ITAT remands Naimishbhai Kantibhai Patel’s reassessment case for a fresh opportunity, citing non-compliance and imposing a Rs. 5,000 cost.
Mumbai ITAT dismisses PCIT’s Section 263 order against Kisan Agro Mart, ruling a presumed 3% commission on accommodation entries was based on surmises, lacking evidence.
Dehradun ITAT rules Form 10B filing is directory, not mandatory, allowing charitable trusts to claim Section 11 exemption even with delayed submissions.
