ITAT Ahmedabad has removed a Rs. 52.91 lakh tax addition on a land purchase, citing unreliable evidence from a draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
ITAT Nagpur sets aside an ex-parte CIT(A) order for assessment year 2017-18, imposing Rs. 10,000 cost on the assessee for chronic procedural delays and non-compliance.
Mumbai ITAT deletes income additions for Asha Bhadra in penny stock case, citing SEBI report and judicial precedents confirming genuine share transactions.
The ITAT Mumbai has ruled in the case of Dhiren Ramanlal Shah vs. ITO, allowing an individual partner to carry forward losses and get relief from late fees. The ruling hinges on the fact that the partner’s firm had to file an audit report, extending the partner’s own filing deadline.
Mumbai ITAT sets aside PCIT’s revisionary order against Johar Hasan Zojwalla, ruling that jurisdiction was wrongly assumed due to a factual error in the assessment year.
ITAT Chandigarh sets aside tax addition against Amico Textiles, ruling assessment invalid due to AO’s failure to follow mandatory Section 153C procedure for seized documents.
ITAT Ahmedabad limits business expense disallowance to 10% for Raj Quarry, citing lack of AO justification and assessee’s loss position.
ITAT Ahmedabad sends unexplained demonetization cash deposit case back to AO, granting assessee new chance to explain source after ex-parte order.
ITAT Mumbai rules on disallowances, unexplained cash, reassessment validity in J. Kumar Infraprojects tax case, partly upholding CIT(A)’s relief.
ITAT Ahmedabad remands a case to the CIT(A) for a third time, citing a failure to follow binding directions in a dispute over a bogus purchase.