The Tribunal held that long-term capital gains cannot be disallowed solely on investigation reports and assumptions. It found that documentary evidence and investment history supported genuineness, leading to deletion of additions under Section 68.
ITAT holds TDS applies on year-end provisions where payee, amount, and nature are identifiable—assessee treated in default u/s 201. Relief allowed if payees paid tax; no TDS default on salary provisions as deduction arises on payment.
ITAT allows Section 80P deduction to Souharda society, holding registration under Souharda Act qualifies as co-operative society; rejects technical denial, finds no non-member dealings, and rules even disallowances boosting income remain eligible for 80P deduction.
ITAT allows deduction of interest paid under capital bond agreement, holding a clear contractual obligation existed; since corresponding interest income was taxed, matching liability must be allowed-disallowance deleted as one-sided taxation is impermissible.
Delay of 208 days condoned on bona fide grounds with ₹1,000 cost; ITAT sets aside ex-parte CIT(A) order, holding denial of hearing violates natural justice, and remands matter to AO for fresh adjudication with full opportunity.
ITAT remands ₹33.12 lakh agricultural income claim due to lack of evidence; holds no proof means taxable u/s 68/115BBE, but grants one more chance for verification, imposing ₹2,000 cost for non-compliance.
Condonation of 100 + month delay allowed on liberal principles with ₹5,000 cost; ITAT holds gross receipts of charitable trust cannot be taxed-even if Sec 11 denied, only net income after expenses is taxable; matter remanded for verification.
TP ruling clarifies that comparables must meet uniform filters, FAR analysis prevails over search matrix, ESOP adjustments require parity, working capital needs scientific computation, and delayed receivables attract LIBOR-based interest.
The case examined reassessment based on third-party information without independent application of mind. The Tribunal ruled that reliance on borrowed satisfaction invalidated the addition, leading to its deletion.
The issue involved unexplained bank credits treated under Section 69A. The Tribunal held that the assessee proved identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness, leading to deletion of the addition.
