ITAT Jaipur rules in Shobha Tomar Vs DCIT that cash deposits from professional income during demonetization cannot be deemed unexplained. Detailed analysis inside.
ITAT noted that CIT(A)’s decision was reasoned, considering discrepancies in repayment timelines and absence of proper documentation or corroborative evidence. It concluded that CIT(A)’s findings were based on facts and did not merely rely on suspicion.
Merely because certain cash was deposited in the specified bank notes by the assessee during the demonetization period will not make the assessee tainted party when the very same transaction are being made by the assessee in the part as well as in the future.
Detailed analysis of Dhoom Singh Sharma Vs ITO case where ITAT Delhi accepts agricultural income proof, overturning Rs.16.4 Lakhs addition. Read the full order.
Detailed analysis of the ITAT Kolkata ruling on Shringar Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT, highlighting key arguments, legal precedents, and the final judgment.
ITAT Indore dismisses revenue appeals in ITO Vs. M.P. Police Sakh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit due to low tax effect, citing CBDT Circular No. 5/2024 eliminating audit objections.
Explore the detailed ITAT Mumbai order analysis of Yogesh P. Thakkar vs DCIT, focusing on disputed long-term capital gains and commission expenditure.
Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in DCIT vs. Dilip B. Jiwrajka covering appeals against additions of unexplained income and commission under IT Act sections 68 & 69C for AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16.
ITAT Delhi rules Section 56(2)(vii) inapplicable to non-residents, deleting Rs. 9.31 Cr addition for APL Logistics Vascor Automotive Pvt. Ltd. Read full order and analysis.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order in Durga Fire Work Vs ITO case for AY 2017-18. Learn why Delhi ITAT ruled cash deposits during demonetization as non-taxable.
