Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Sushil Kumar Sharma (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Sushil Kumar Sharma (ITAT Delhi) Merely because certain cash was deposited in the specified bank notes by the assessee during the demonetization period will not make the assessee tainted party when the very same transaction are being made by the assessee in the part as well as in the future. In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi has deleted additions for unexplained cash deposits in the case of DCIT vs. Sushil Kumar Sharma. This judgment highlights the importance of substantiating transactions with proper evidence, especially during critical periods li...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930