ITAT Delhi rules that filing Form 67 is not mandatory for Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claims, and procedural violations shouldn’t deny the right to FTC.
ITAT Chandigarh rules that the assessee cannot be denied Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) due to delay in filing Form No. 67.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that claim of deduction u/s 80P is admissible only when the claim of deduction u/s 80P is made in the return of income filed on or before the due date prescribed u/s 139(1). Thus, deduction u/s. 80P inadmissible when return is filed after due date prescribed u/s. 139(1).
CBDT had issued instructions/notification for examining the specific cases regarding cash deposits during the demonetisation period. However, both the lower authorities had not done so and therefore, the matter was remanded for re-examination.
AO noted that the assessee was unable to satisfied the ingredients of section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Thus, AO applied section 68 and added into total income and applied tax rate as per section 115BBE of the Act. Accordingly assessed income was determined at Rs.75,49,764.
ITAT Bangalore held that the addition of provision of bad and doubtful debts as per P&L account to determine the book profits u/s. 115JB of the act is not warranted as actual write off would not be hit by clause (i) of explanation to section 115JB.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that no disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act warranted as interest-free funds exceed the investments made, and there is no evidence to suggest that borrowed funds were used for such investments.
ITAT Delhi restored Fiserv India’s appeal, citing CIT(A)’s failure to address adjournment requests. The case will be reconsidered for a fair hearing and review.
ITAT Ahmedabad confirms that fulfilling Section 148 requirements under the Income Tax Act eliminates the need for a separate notice under Section 143(2).
ITAT Ahmedabad overturns ex parte order against Takshashila Realties Pvt Ltd due to non-receipt of notices, remands case for fresh consideration.
