ITAT Ahmedabad held that imposition of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act justified as deduction was claimed u/s. 54EC and 54F of the Income Tax Act by furnishing inaccurate particulars.
ITAT Mumbai held that accommodation entries in the nature of bogus unsecured loans is liable to be added as unexplained under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, addition u/s. 68 confirmed.
ITAT Delhi held that penalty u/s. 271AAB of the Income Tax Act not imposable as AO failed to link additional income disclosed by the assessee with the incriminating material found during search. Thus, penalty u/s. 271AAB deleted.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that initiation of reopening of assessment based on mere change of opinion and not taking into account the work-in-progress method of accounting followed by the assessee is unjustifiable and liable to be quashed.
Assessee-company was engaged in the business of trading of electromechanical relays, wire and wireless equipment, high performance polymeric products, highly specialized energy related products, was subject to scrutiny.
ITAT Ahmedabad quashes reassessment of Specific Ceramics Ltd for FY 2008-09 due to non-issuance of mandatory notice under Section 143(2).
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that an assessment is invalid if mandatory notice under Section 143(2) was not issued, highlighting Section 292BB’s limitations.
ITAT Rajkot rules on Girishbhai Nanjibhai Solanki case, addressing validity of reopening assessment and notice under sections 143(2) and 148 of Income Tax Act.
Assessing foreign tax credit claim rejected due to Form 67 filing delay. The CIT(A) upheld disallowance for AY 2020-21. Tribunal reviews COVID-19 extensions.
ITAT Bangalore ruled on Deepak Shimoga Padmaraju foreign tax credit claim, denied due to late filing of Form 67 after the due date for the AY 2021-22.
