Bombay High Court held that liability for year 2010-2011 duly discharged by the petitioner. Hence, adjustment of refund for year 2011-2012 against liability for 2010-2011 unjustified. State authorities cannot retain the excess amount which is not in accordance with law
Calcutta HC rules that the assessee in ‘Education Research And Development Foundation Vs Union Of India’ can deposit less than 20% of disputed tax for a stay of demand.
Calcutta HC invalidates Section 144B assessment order due to insufficient response time given. Court remands case, emphasizing violation of natural justice.
The Madras High Court ruled in Satluj Credit & Holdings Pvt Ltd Vs ITO that discrepancies between reasons in notices u/s 148A(b) and orders u/s 148A(d) invalidate the notice’s purpose.
Detailed analysis of Calcutta HC’s judgment in Anup Kumar Agarwal vs Union of India, addressing issues under Sections 148A and 151A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Read the detailed analysis of Telangana High Court’s judgment on Himani Navaratan Oil, Gold Turmeric Ayurvedic Cream, and other products. Understand the classification under APGST Act and implications.
Calcutta High Court quashes IT order against Triton Overseas for jurisdictional issues under Section 148A(d). Learn about the Court’s decision and implications.
Gujarat High Court quashes vague show cause notice against KRD Enterprise, highlighting need for detailed grounds in GST registration disputes.
Delhi High Court’s ruling in Green Polymers Vs Union of India invalidates GST cancellation and restores the petitioner’s GST registration.
Bombay High Court rules on jurisdiction of JAO to issue reassessment notices under faceless assessment, impacting Income Tax Act Section 148A(b).
