Bombay High Court ruled on TDS for Nanavati Hospital. It confirmed doctors are independent professionals, but remanded the AMC matter for re-evaluation.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that compensation for land acquired under the NH Act is exempt from income tax, citing the RFCTLARR Act and Supreme Court precedents.
Karnataka High Court held that in terms of section 142(7)(b) and 142(8)(b) of the KGST Act all types of amounts refundable are to be refunded back in cash without there being any distinction between cash deposit or ITC/ECL deposit. Accordingly, 70% pre-deposit made through ITC/ECL is to be refunded in cash.
Department had not been able to show any arrangement to have been made by assessee in the course of selling its shares of M/s. HCL Technologies Pvt. Ltd. amounted to Impermissible Avoidance Arrangement (for short, ‘IAA’) and it was a pure trading done by assessee with no knowledge.
The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST order against Virendra Kumar Surendra Prakash, citing a portal error where the order was not properly displayed to the taxpayer.
Rajasthan High Court held that department is under a statutory obligation to refund the amount with interest @12% p.a.. Therefore, rejection of claim of refund vide order dated 04th January 2023, is unsustainable in the eye of law.
The petitioner has a division “Pearson Vue” which is engaged in providing computer based test administration solutions and pursuant to its contract with GMAC, USA, the petitioner conduct GMAT on behalf of GMAC for candidates in India.
Orissa High Court held that contractual dispute cannot be tainted with criminality. Accordingly, pre-arrest bail granted to the company liquidator [petitioner] since insolvency proceedings are pending before NCLT.
Karnataka High Court held that any officer below the rank of Joint Commissioner cannot by himself inspect the premises of any taxable person without authorization from the Joint Commissioner in term of section 67 of the CGST Act.
Calcutta High Court held that cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect on the basis of vague show cause notice not furnishing any details is not in accordance with law. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed and orders cancelling registration set aside.
