Held that the State of Maharashtra has legislative competence to enact amendment to incorporate a condition/modifying the earlier condition for entertaining an appeal for a mandatory pre-deposit for filing appeals against the assessment orders pertaining to all the goods after 16th September 2016
Held that the limitation period of six months is applicable from 1st April 2022. Accident in this case had occurred on 23.05.2019. Accordingly, limitation period of six months u/s 166(3) of Motor Vehicles Act doesn’t apply.
Since the ex-promoters/directors and similarly situated chartered accountants have been granted bail, there is no reason why the Applicant should be treated any differently. Bail granted
Held that if an offence committed by the firm, is also an offence committed by the partners, it cannot be bifurcated as partners and the firm
Held that the 180 days window in Section 5 contemplates an end-point whereas the Supreme Court in the Suo Motu writ petition sought to protect the starting-point, which was at the risk of being defeated by reason of the pandemic.
In the matter of bail, there is no straitjacket formula for consideration of bail to an accused as it all depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case.
Held that as notice for reopening of assessment u/s 148 was not served, within the time stipulated u/s 149, reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 is untenable in law
B.C. Mohankumar Vs Superintendent of Central Goods & Service Tax (Madras High Court) Rejection of application for GST registration: HC heold that order in this case is non-speaking, arbitrary and evidently has not taken into account the explanation furnished by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent refers to Rule 9(4), particularly the deployment of […]
Devendra Prakash Shah Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) 1. We have heard Mr. P. B. Shah, learned advocate appearing in support of this writ petition. 2. Having read the averments made in the writ petition and the relief claimed therein, we are of the considered prima facie view that because of the lapse […]
Venkateswara Electricals Vs State of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Pradesh High Court) HC Directs Revenue Department to grant refund of the excess payment along with the interest due to delay The Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in M/s Venkateswara Electricals v State of Andhra Pradesh [Writ Petition No. 4072 of 2022 dated March 9, 2022] directed […]
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
